What if the biggest challenge of contemporary workplaces is not resignation but quiet withdrawal? The phrase “quiet quitting” over the last several years has ignited global conversations, not about workers quitting, but about those who stick around—checked out, demotivated and disengaged. These individuals clock in and complete their tasks, but the spark is gone. They no longer go the extra mile, contribute ideas, or invest beyond the bare minimum. It’s a subtle rebellion, often rooted in burnout, unmet expectations, or a lack of recognition. And while quiet quitting may be quiet, its consequences for morale, productivity, and workplace culture are anything but loud.
Defining Quiet Quitting
Quiet quitting happens when workers do precisely what they are instructed to do in the workplace—no overtime, no late nights, and no offering to do anything more. While they are there in body, they are disengaged in mind and spirit. They do this because they lack a good work-life balance, are burnt out, and feel unappreciated and undervalued. It is not sloth, but passive resistance—an effort to restore boundaries and keep well when organizational support is unavailable.
Powered by social media, particularly among Millennials and Gen Z, quiet quitting is a larger cultural movement away from hustle culture towards prioritizing mental health and meaningful work. While the term is new, the phenomenon is a manifestation of established trends in workplace disengagement. Its increasing visibility puts employers to the test to reexamine how they interact, motivate, and invest in their employees so that this quiet quitting is not the rule but the exception.
The Psychological Underpinning of Quiet Quitting
Psychological resistance is the underlying cause of quiet quitting — a passive type of rebellion whereby workers drain effort out as an adaptation to complaints or dissatisfaction experienced in the workplace. Psychological resistance may be precipitated by the following among other reasons:

Lack of Appreciation and Recognition
Employees who believe that their hard work is not valued are likely to disengage. Gallup also did a poll which showed that staff who are not given proper praise are twice as likely to leave in the near future — if employees consistently put in extra effort without being recognized, they may feel undervalued, which can reduce motivation and engagement. Failure to commend employees tends to erode confidence in top brass and weaken corporate morale on an overall standpoint (Sarwar et al., 2020).
Poor Work-Life Balance
Overwork and undue expectations can result in burnout, prompting employees to decrease work intensity in a bid to maintain their health. The American Institute of Stress shows that 83% of workers are stressed at work, indicating how normalized the situation is. When workers are constantly on call or asked to work extended hours, their work-life and personal lives become interrelated, and they develop chronic stress and long-term disengagement (Russell et al., 2020).
Limited Growth Prospects
When employees believe that they don’t have any avenue for growth or career advancement, they get demotivated, and they disengage. From a study conducted by LinkedIn, 93% of the employees would stay longer in an organization if the organization invested in their careers. Without clearly stated avenues of growth, employees can become stagnant, resulting in them withdrawing effort and seeking other options (Gün, 2023).
Poor Communication and Feedback
Poor open communication from management to staff can cause isolation and undervaluation, thus quiet quitting behaviour. Feedback and communication channels must be provided to allow staff participation. Workers may get frustrated and disconnect from the mission and values of the organization if they are not given feedback or do not feel heard (Srivastava et al., 2024).
Restricted Autonomy at Work
Employees micromanaged or denied decision autonomy at work may be lower in job satisfaction. Employees with high job autonomy on a task featured in the Journal of Occupational Health Psychology scored higher in job satisfaction and lower in turnover intentions. When employees are not given the right to claim ownership of their work, they feel helpless and isolated (Kumar, 2018).
Inadequate Compensation and Benefits
Competitive pay and benefit packages are major factors in employee retention. The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) reports that 64% of employees consider compensation to be a top job satisfaction determinant. When workers believe they are not being fairly compensated for the work they perform, resentment and lack of motivation can occur and lead to quiet quitting practices (Karrania et al., 2023).

The Impact of Quiet Quitting on Organizations
The consequences of quiet quitting extend beyond the level of worker performance. Organisations may face:
Reduced Productivity
Disengaged employees are not likely to add innovative ideas or go the extra mile, thus the overall levels of productivity become lower. When individuals perform at the lowest level, the potential for improvement and growth by the company declines. It bars the company from responding to shifting circumstances and staying competitive (Lee et al., 2023).
Lower Morale
The existence of quiet quitters could also affect team performance, making other employees dissatisfied and having low morale. If the team members observe others disengaging without getting punished, this can create a culture of complacency and dampen the passion and drive of the team overall. The low morale may also lead to disengagement, creating a cycle of underperformance (Sarwar et al., 2020).
Increased Turnover
Extended disengagement can ultimately lead to actual resignations, while organizational recruitment and training costs continue to run higher. Too much turnover can disintegrate teams and cause the loss of institutional memory. Further, the labour and cost associated with hiring and educating new employees may overwhelm the organization’s capacity and weaken its ability to achieve strategic objectives (Gün, 2023).
Quiet Quitting Reduction Strategies
Addressing quiet quitting head-on is not a band-aid problem—it is a thoughtful, people centered solution that builds workplace culture and employee engagement from the ground up:

Regular Check-Ins
Regular one-on-one talks between the workers and the managers instill confidence and keeps the communication channels open. The regular check-ins make room for the employees to provide feedback, get assistance they require, and triumph through accomplishment. If the expectations are well-aligned, everybody gets a sense of belonging and is more a part of the team (Karrania et al., 2023).
Recognition Programs
Individuals must be seen and heard for the effort they devote to their jobs. Whether an official recognition, a bonus, a thank you, or a mention at a team meeting — respect is a return on investment. When employees are actually valued and seen, it improves the morale, boosts confidence, and creates a more positive environment across the group. It’s not every time about rewards—it’s about letting people feel treated with respect and cared for. And once that is done, they’re far more likely to continue to give their all (Sarwar et al., 2020).
Clear expectations
Employees feel more at ease when they are aware of their roles and performance targets are defined clearly. Clarity minimizes miscommunication and enables one to know how their work fits into a larger picture, which contributes to enhanced motivation and responsibility (Srivastava et al., 2024).
Constructive Feedback Mechanisms
Having consistent two-way feedback processes makes workers feel valued and listened to, so they feel comfortable improving continually. It helps identify problems early on, allows recognition and development, and promotes communication — mandating participation and reflecting concern for worker well-being (Srivastava et al., 2024).
Flexible work arrangements
Work flexibility, such as telecommuting, flexible workdays, or flexible time, has the ability to enable workers to have greater control over their career and private lives. It eliminates rush-hour stress, accommodates differences in work style, and eliminates burnout. Perhaps above all, it conveys the message that the company believes in its people, and that’s highly effective at inspiring engagement and job satisfaction (Russell et al., 2020).
Positive Work Culture
Fostering an environment that is inclusive and supportive motivates collaboration and boosts employee well-being. An organizational culture valuing diversity and respect, where employees feel they belong and are working for a purpose, maximizes engagement. This can be built by effective leadership, appreciation programs, and work-life balance (Sarwar et al., 2020).
Read More: The Subtle Ways GenZ Is Redefining Work Culture (Psychologists Weigh In)
Fostering Social Connections
Team-building activities and relaxed interaction facilitate relationship development and a sense of belonging. Individual relationships at work enhance collaboration, morale, and serve as a stress buffer to ensure worker satisfaction and retention (Srivastava et al., 2024).
Professional Development Opportunities
Investing in employees in training and career development programs reflects a concern for their long-term success. Providing channels for skill accumulation and career progression enhances motivation and retention. Employees who see a career track will be more likely to stay motivated and engaged in their jobs. This investment comes back to the individual and the company’s talent base and flexibility (Gün, 2023).

Autonomy Empowerment
Removing employees’ ownership sense enhances engagement and helps reduce helplessness. Autonomous workers are likely to take the initiative, innovate, and take ownership of outcomes. Through goal freedom, organizations build trust, motivation grows, and quiet quitting diminishes (Kumar, 2018).
Conclusion
Quiet quitting is a problem for contemporary companies and says a lot about deeper issues like employee motivation, gratitude, and wellness. Companies can help provide a healthier and more productive workforce by knowing the psychological motivations behind the problem and putting complete solutions in place to address it. Proactive steps towards open dialogue, gratitude, and employee growth are imperative in reducing quiet quitting and fostering a positive company culture.
FAQs
1. What is quiet quitting and how does it differ from resignation?
Quiet quitting is employees simply doing exactly what their work is—no extra work, overtime, or passion—yet staying in their jobs. Unlike regular resignation, quiet quitting is passive resignation instead of job quitting.
2. Why does quiet quitting happen?
Quiet quitting is most often due to burnout, bad work-life balance, bad recognition, bad opportunities for career advancement, micromanaging, and bad pay. All these lead workers to quietly quit by zoning out but performing only a bare minimum of work responsibilities.
3. What impact does quiet quitting have on organizations?
Quiet quitting results in lower productivity, poorer staff morale, and increased employee turnover. It can be used to obliterate workplace culture, reduce creativity and innovation, and have a negative effect on the general performance and welfare of the employees of the organization.
4. Why are Gen Z and Millennials more connected to quiet quitting?
Millennials and Gen Z talk publicly about mental wellness, work-life balance, and meaningful work. Social media and the fall of hustle culture are compelling them towards more likely, quietly pushing against toxic work culture by establishing firm boundaries.
5. What can companies do to avoid quiet quitting?
Employers can prevent quiet quitting by promoting open communication, employee appreciation, flexible working schedules, opportunities for professional development, and a friendly and inclusive work culture.
6. In what ways do feedback and autonomy restrict quiet quitting?
Positive feedback tells employees that their voice matters and that they are important to build, and autonomy provides them with the ability to take ownership of their work. Both promote motivation, trust, and engagement—crucial in evading quiet quitting.
References +
- Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235
- Chen, S., Zhang, L., & Liu, J. (2022). Discretionary work effort and the boundaries of job roles: A study of disengagement behavior in knowledge workers. Academy of Management Journal, 65(6), 1520–1542. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2020.0708
- Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516- 113108
- Grant, A. M., & Parker, S. K. (2009). Redesigning work design theories: The rise of relational and proactive perspectives. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 317–375. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520903047327
- Gün, F. (2023). Quiet quitting and employee performance: The mediating role of organizational commitment. Journal of Business Research, 161, 113791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113791
- Hobfoll, S. E., & Shirom, A. (2001). Conservation of resources theory: Applications to stress and management in the workplace. In R. T. Golembiewski (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior. Marcel Dekker.
- Karrania, M., Soltani, I., & Javadian, S. (2023). Quiet quitting and psychological detachment: A model for employee disengagement in the post-COVID workplace. Human Resource Development International, 26(4), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2023.2215761
- Klotz, A. C., & Bolino, M. C. (2023). The dark side of organizational citizenship behavior: Consequences for the employee and the organization. Academy of Management Perspectives, 37(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2021.0134
- Kumar, P. (2018). Autonomy in the workplace: A key to employee engagement. International Journal of Management Research and Reviews, 8(2), 24–30.
- Lee, J. Y., Kim, Y. S., & Park, S. H. (2023). Workplace burnout, job satisfaction, and turnover intention: The moderating effect of psychological resilience. Occupational Health Science, 7(2), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-023-00126-1
- Liu, Y., Wang, Z., & Lu, W. (2021). The role of recognition in promoting employee engagement: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(3), 448–469. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000804
- Rees, C. J., Alfes, K., & Gatenby, M. (2013). Employee voice and engagement: Connections and consequences. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(14), 2780–2798. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.763843
- Russell, H., O’Connell, P. J., & McGinnity, F. (2020). The impact of flexible working arrangements on work-life conflict and work pressure in Ireland. Gender, Work & Organization, 27(1), 36–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12494
- Sarwar, H., Imran, M. K., & Amin, S. (2020). How does authentic leadership curb quiet quitting? The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(6), 889–903. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-10- 2019-0449
- Srivastava, S., Mishra, A., & Yadav, R. (2024). Impact of leadership communication on quiet quitting: A mediation model of job embeddedness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 45(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2685
Leave feedback about this