Relationship

Psychology behind BreadCrumbing

In today’s quick-moving dating scene, where a swipe or alike can help you find love, a new word sums up many people’s chaotic muddle: ‘breadcrumbing’. Think about this, you’re flirting with someone who seems to like you, but each try to get closer to them meets with a fuzzy answer and uncertain promises. This is breadcrumbing.

It is a situation where one drops just enough hints to keep someone interested without planning to take things further. As the virtual tech world becomes more entangled with our lives, it has impacted even the dating scene, creating a bunch of words that mirror our experiences. From ghosting to benching, each term shows a different side of today’s relationship scenario. But breadcrumbing stands out among every other; it leaves people swinging between hope and letdown often leading to emotional stress.

Read More: 10 Strategies to Deal with Hopelessness

New studies dive deep into this trend to look at how it correlates to unclear attachments among the younger generation in different parts of the world. By checking how attachment styles affect breadcrumbing habits, these studies shed new light on a practice that’s become way too common in our digital world. As we unpack this concept, we gain not only insights into the mechanics of breadcrumbing but also a deeper understanding of how our emotional framework shapes our romantic lives.

Understanding Breadcrumbing

The word Breadcrumbing has originated on the internet and essentially means leaving a trail of crumbs. Just like how someone would drop bread crumbs for their pets or other domestic animals. Similarly,  small signs of interest that excite, but lead to nowhere are dropped to hook the other person. This action can cause confusion and emotional distress for the people who are at the receiving end of it, often making them doubt their self-worth and the genuineness of their romantic options. 

Dr Gemma Harris points out, as mentioned in the research, ‘Attachment Insecurity and Breadcrumbing Engagement in Young Adults’, that people with low self-esteem or those who are very empathetic might be more likely to fall for these manipulative strategies.

Breadcrumbing and John Bowlby’s Theory of Attachment

John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth’s attachment theory may very well be studied on infants, but it expands its scope to adults as well. It attempts to explain what different types of attachment styles are and through this, it becomes simpler to understand modern dating behaviours like breadcrumbing. According to their framework, individuals develop attachment styles  –

  • secure, 
  • anxious, 
  • and avoidant attachment style.

A Study on Bowlby’s attachment theory found out that infants left in an unaccustomed environment and separated from their mothers will, at reunion, typically respond in one of these ways:

  • Secure attachment: These babies cried when left alone but were easily comforted by the parents’ arrival.
  • Anxious attachment: A smaller number of infants revealed higher levels of distress and, on reunion with the parents, seemed to desire comfort but also to “punish” the parents for abandoning them.
  • Avoidant attachment: Infants in the third category showed no stress or minimal stress upon being separated from their parents and either ignored the parents upon reuniting or actively avoided the parents.

These styles profoundly influence adult romantic interactions as well. In the context of breadcrumbing, those with anxious attachment often seek validation and emotional closeness. Conversely, individuals with avoidant attachment tend to shy away from intimacy.

A Research Study

A recent study involving 334 participants from India and 348 from Spain aimed to explore the relationship between breadcrumbing and attachment insecurity. Using a linear regression model, researchers analyzed how sociodemographic factors such as age, sex, sexual orientation, relationship status, and educational level, interacted with two dimensions of attachment insecurity: ‘anxious and avoidant attachment styles’.

The findings revealed a notable association between insecure attachment styles and engagement in breadcrumbing behaviours across both countries. However, there were distinct cultural differences; in India, anxious attachment was more closely linked to breadcrumbing, while in Spain, avoidant attachment showed a stronger correlation.

The cultural environment has a deep impact on a wide range of social behaviours, including attachment. For example, countries founded in interdependent understandings of the self (eastern cultures) where individuals tend to be more dependent on others and more fearful of rejection, may promote more anxious attachment. Countries founded in independent understandings of the self (western cultures) where autonomy and personal goals are valued over that of the collective, may promote more avoidant attachment.

Implications of Attachment Styles

These findings have a huge impact on understanding the modern dating culture. People with anxious attachment worry a lot about being left alone and therefore want to be close to others. This often makes them cling to short-term interactions that promise to offer more than they do. This back-and-forth can make you feel good one minute and bad the next moment. 

On the other hand, people who avoid attachment tend to step back from close relationships. They use breadcrumbs as a way to protect themselves from getting hurt. They might send just enough messages to keep someone interested, but they stay far away to avoid getting too close. This shows how different ways of attachment with others can affect how people act in relationships across various cultures. It reveals the link between how we handle emotions and how modern relationships work.

Conclusion

Bowlby and Aisworth’s theory as well as this study not only provides valuable insights into an under-researched aspect of modern relationships but also emphasizes the importance of understanding one’s attachment style. Recognizing these patterns can empower individuals to navigate their romantic lives more effectively. By identifying these patterns and being more aware of them, people can foster healthier connections and reduce the emotional distress associated with breadcrumbing.

Read More: I Love You But I Can’t Commit!

As dating continues to evolve in the digital age, awareness around behaviours like breadcrumbing becomes crucial. By understanding the psychological underpinnings of these interactions, young adults can better negotiate their intimate relationships and avoid being led on by mere crumbs of affection. Grasping the concept of these attachment styles shines a light on the emotional complexities of breadcrumbing. As dating continues to evolve at lightning-fast speed in the digital age, it empowers individuals to break free from unhealthy patterns and build more fulfilling relationships.

References +
  • Khattar, Vivek & Huete-Alcocer, Nuria & Navarro, Raúl. (2023). Attachment insecurity and breadcrumbing engagement in young adults: a cross-sectional, cross-country study in India and Spain. BMC Psychology. 11. 356. 10.1186/s40359-023-01404-y. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374974809_Attachment_insecurity_and_breadcrumbing_engagement_in_young_adults_a_cross-_sectional_cross-country_study_in_India_and_Spain
  • Pattemore, C. (2022, May 4). Breadcrumbing: understanding why you’re being led on. Psych Central. https://psychcentral.com/relationships/breadcrumbing
  • Ackerman, C. E., MA. (2024, September 26). What is Attachment Theory? Bowlby’s 4 Stages Explained. PositivePsychology.com. https://positivepsychology.com/attachment-theory/

Exit mobile version