Awareness

Flashbulb Memories: Capturing the Vivid Recollection of Significant Life Events

flashbulb-memories

Have you ever noticed how certain moments of your life are vividly engraved into your memory with extraordinary clarity? (like earthquakes) These vivid recollections, often of significant or emotional events, are known as flashbulb memories. Unlike everyday memories that may fade or blur over time, flashbulb memories remain strikingly clear and detailed, sometimes for a decade. 

Why Flashbulb Memories Occur 

One kind of autobiographical memory that captures the specifics of a significant event is a flashbulb memory. Psychologists James Kulik and Roger Brown first used the term in 1977. They postulated that our brain’s emotional reaction to startling or profound events produces a permanent mental picture, just like a camera’s flash highlights and records an image. These recollections usually contain your location, your activities, your companions, and your emotions. Typical instances comprise recollections of your location during a significant historical occurrence, like the 9/11 attacks, or individual achievements, like getting married or having a child. 

The brain part called the amygdala, which is concerned with controlling emotions, and the hippocampus, are two parts important for flashbulb memory formation. A stimulating event triggers the amygdala, which enhances the hippocampus’s ability to encode memories. A stronger and more persistent memory trace is frequently the result of this elevated emotional state. 

The development of flashbulb memory 

The term flashbulb memory was developed by Roger Brown and James Kulik in their 1977 research paper which was published in Cognition. When they studied why American people vividly remember the assassination of John F. Kennedy, this event put the entire USA in a state of shock and emergency. People remembered JFKs assassination in eerie detail, including memories about “where they were” at the moment, and “what was their emotional reaction”. 

According to Brown and Kulik, three things lead to the flashbulb memory:

  • This event should come as a surprise 
  • The event itself must be of interest and importance to multiple people
  • The event must lead to an intensified emotional response 

If these three conditions are not present or don’t reach significant levels, it’s Hard Luck that a flashbulb memory will be formed. 

Example of flashbulb memory 

  • Earthquake 
  • Covid Pandemic
  • Sanjay Gandhi assassination 
  • Terrorist attack on 9/11or 26/11 
  • The death of Princess Diana
  • Fukushima nuclear disaster
  • The 2008 global financial crisis
  • The fall of the Berlin war 
  • Hiroshima and Nagasaki nuclear blast 
  • Pearl Harbor attack 

Why Do We Have Flashbulb Memories? 

  • Survival Mechanism: Humans have Evolved to remember critical events, especially those related to danger or threat. These memories will help us understand this event and be safe from it In the future. For example, when earthquakes occur instead of hiding in the cave human enters open space, this happens only because they saw others lose their lives in this event. 
  • Social Function: when a collective action has occurred, human beings interact with others, to gain social support, and strengthen their relationships. Flashbulb memory leads to a sense of collectiveness and identity. For example, people often share their stories and struggles during the pandemic, and discussing and recalling vivid memories helps to develop a sense of belonging. 
  • biological factors: Emotional stimulation activates the amygdala, enhancing memory consolidation with the hippocampus. Leading to stronger and more enduring memory.
  • Digital Age: Recording and media allow for instant documentation and sharing of significant events. Digital footprint reinforces memories and provides evidence of events.  

Difference between Flashback and Flashbulb Memory

Flashbulb Memories:
  • Nature: Vivid, detailed memories of significant and emotional events.
  • Emotional impact: it can be good or bad, but a bad event elicits more emotional damage making it easier to remember. 
  • Accuracy: it can be misleading and incorrect at times. 
  • Retrieval: Easily retrieved and with precise details.
  • Common Example: Recollections of where one was during significant events like the 9/11 attacks.
PTSD Flashbacks: 
  • Nature: Recurrent, involuntary memories of traumatic events. 
  • Emotional Impact: Emotional distress can turn into depression and anxiety and is displayed by physical distress. 
  • Accuracy: This can feel extremely vivid and real but may not accurately represent the actual event. 
  • Retrieval: It’s retrieved suddenly and without warning often triggered by stimuli reminding you of the trauma
  • Common Example: A war veteran reliving a battlefield experience upon hearing a loud noise. 

Accuracy of flashbulb memory 

A group of researchers examined flashbulb memories related to the September 11th attacks, assessing how people recalled these events over ten years to evaluate the accuracy of these memories. They found that this memory is most accurate immediately after the event but accuracy declined within the first year. After the first year, the level of forgetfulness was a constant and did not change greatly over the following ten years. 

Conclusion 

Flashbulb memories offer a unique glimpse into how our brains preserve emotionally significant events with vivid clarity. While these memories are vividly remembered, they can become inaccurate over time. The emotional impact of events leads to the formation of these memories, involving brain areas like the amygdala and hippocampus. Understanding these mechanisms highlights the powerful connection between emotion and memory while distinguishing flashbulb memories from PTSD flashbacks underscores the importance of addressing traumatic experiences with proper care.

Read More: PTSD: Symptoms, Diagnosis and Treatment

FAQs 
1. What is a flashbulb memory? 

This is a memory where we Recall and remember highly vivid memories of the event where a person learns about shocking or emotionally significant information. Flashbulb memories are distinct because of their vividness and the confidence with which people recall them. They often include specific details such as where they were, what they were doing, who they were with, and how they felt at the time of the event. 

2. What causes flashbulb memories to form? 

They are caused by the combination of the event’s unexpected nature and high emotional arousal. Over time, details can become less accurate. 

3. What are some common examples of Flashbulb Memories? 

Common examples include: 

  • The 26/11 terrorist attacks 
  • The Space Shuttle Challenger disaster 
  • The death of Princess Diana 
  • The COVID-19 pandemic outbreak announcement
4. Do flashbulb memories affect everyone the same way? 

Not necessarily. The impact of an event and the formation of a flashbulb memory can vary based on personal significance, emotional impact, and cultural context. Yes, some positive events are personal achievements, the birth of a child, or a major sporting victory.

5. How can I test my flashbulb memories? 

To test your flashbulb memories, try to recall the details of where you were, who you were with, what you were doing, and how you felt during a significant event. Then check whether they are aligning with the facts. Yes, external factors such as media, discussions with others, and news can influence and potentially alter flashbulb memories over time.

References
  • Brown, Roger; Kulik, James (1977). “Flashbulb memories”. Cognition. 5 (1): 73–99. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(77)90018-X. S2CID 53195074. 
  • Bohannon, John Neil; Symons, Victoria Louise (1992-10-30), “Flashbulb memories: Confidence, consistency, and quantity”, Affect and Accuracy in Recall, Cambridge University Press, pp. 65–92, doi:10.1017/cbo9780511664069.005, ISBN 978-0-521-40188-3 
  • Day MV, Ross M. Predicting confidence in flashbulb memories. Memory. 2014;22(3):232-242. doi:10.1080/09658211.2013.778290
  • Hirst W, Phelps EA. Flashbulb Memories. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2016;25(1):36-41. doi:10.1177/0963721415622487
Exit mobile version